Degrees of scientific separation

There are a couple of interesting entries here and here at the Touchstone weblog about the importance of scientific “descent”—who is descended from whom by apprenticeship or similarly intimate professional connection. It turns out to be very important indeed. It appears, for example, that all significant chemists are professionally descended from a small number of … More ...

British craziness

The logic of discrimination theory never quits. If there’s a group of people with problems, then the problems are caused by irrational and unjust social discrimination, and comprehensive forcible action is called for to root out and compensate for the discrimination. No other view of the situation is conceivable. A recent example: the British government’s … More ...

I achieve eminence!

Because of the Internet, things I’ve written get picked up on occasion and republished one place or another. I never dreamed, though, that two early twentieth century political scientists, Raymond Garfield Gettel and William Archibald Dunning, would return from the dead—in India, of all places—to include three of my pieces in a book of essential More ...

Tolerance and Inclusiveness

“Inclusiveness” is a basic principle of present-day liberalism and its most important engine of power. It searches the whole of social life to extirpate everything inconsistent with the absolute universal domination of liberal institutions.

Social institutions exist through differentiation, the assignment of power, position and authority among persons. Inclusiveness insists on the eradication of differentiations … More ...

Of logos and logic

Speaking of cynical propaganda, has anyone noticed how bizarre and effective the BP logo is? When you go by one of their gas stations you really are convinced that what they do is Green, Solar, Euro, and in fact Beyond Petroleum—totally different from what those gross American gas companies do. What does it mean that … More ...

French hypocrisy and puritanism strike again

Brigitte Bardot and her publisher have been fined 5,000 Euros each for being on the wrong side of current social issues. The immediate basis of the fines was publication of a book some people found objectionable on acccount of its comments on immigrants, in-your-face homosexuals, and whatnot. Judging by excerpts, the book was no less … More ...