Beltramo: I’ll ask the question in Italian, but we would love to have just a greeting in Spanish. With the enormous growth in the Hispanic presence, the Catholic church in the United States is becoming steadily more bilingual and bicultural. Yet there’s also a growing “anti-immigrant” movement in America. Do you intend to invite the United States to welcome immigrants well, many of whom are Catholic?
Benedict XVI: Unfortunately I’m not ready to speak in Spanish, but I offer a greeting and blessing for all the Spanish-speakers! Certainly I’ll talk about this subject. I recent had the ad limina visit from the bishops of Central America, also South America. I saw the scope of this problem, above all the grave problem of the separation of families. This is truly dangerous for the social, human and moral fabric of these countries.
It seems to me that we have to distinguish between measures to be taken immediately, and longer-term solutions. The fundamental solution [would be] that there is no longer any need to immigrate, that there are sufficient opportunities for work and a sufficient social fabric that no one any longer feels the need to immigrate. We all have to work for this objective, that social development is sufficient so that citizens are able to contribute to their own future.
On this point, I want to speak with the President, because above all the United States must help countries develop themselves. Doing so is in the interests of everyone, not just this country but the whole world, including the United States.
In the short term, it’s very important above all to help the families. This is the primary objective, to ensure that families are protected, not destroyed. Whatever can be done, must be done. Naturally, we have to do whatever’s possible against economic insecurity, against all the forms of violence, so that they can have a worthy life.
I’d like also to say that although there are many problems, so much suffering, there’s also much hospitality [in America.] I know that the bishops’ conference in America collaborates a great deal with the Latin American bishops’ conference. Together they work to help priests, laity and so on. With so many painful things, it’s also important not to forget much good and many positive actions.
I still don’t see what the excitement was about. The comments are well-meaning generalities touched on at an informal press conference. It appears that social coherence at all levels is the overriding concern, which ought to be OK from the standpoint of someone who favors restriction.
In the long run the Pope hopes that immigration will become much less of a factor, and in the meantime he makes no prejudgement as to what this party or that should do to mitigate existing problems. He knows it’s not a perfect world. He just points out some obvious concerns, and his most concrete suggestion is for the United States to promote development in other countries. There are limits of course to how much we can do that, but what’s wrong with the idea?
To my mind, the key points in the statement are that (1) the Pope refused to say anything definite in support of a supposed right to immigrate, and (2) he said that immigration in itself, and by extension the borderless universal-diversity-celebrating world that’s being shoved down our throats, is a Bad Thing. So why don’t restrictionists treat his comments as a huge victory? Why stack the deck against themselves?