[url=http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/26/nyregion/26circumcise.html?ei=5070&en=d3076f6044d0e6f8&ex=1126324800&adxnnl=1&oref=login&adxnnlx=1126180690-9K6Y+OmOE6dlko+K54+fpw]Religious freedom versus health concerns[/url] (registration required), and in this case it’s not about Jehovah’s Witnesses and blood transfusions (though it does involve blood).
5 thoughts on “A test of pluralism?”
Comments are closed.
More comic relief
No, I’m not referring to http://antitechnocrat.net:8000/node/1382 this thread, but rather, to the winner of the most creative entry in the “”who’s to blame for Katrina’s damage to New Orleans?” contest, http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/ArticleLayout/CdaArticlePrintPreview/1,2506,L-3138779,00.html this guy.
He’s a http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9801/11/fringe/israel.nose.picking/ strange one…
You found some gems there,
You found some gems there, Will! I’ll never know how you do it. I’ve never heard of their being many practicing Jews down in Dixie, so maybe that fellow found something. As for nose-picking, I’ll have to wait for the decision of the CDF.
thanks!
I was tipped off to him on another blog; I hadn’t heard of that rabbi previously. He seems, a few sandwiches short of a picnic, if you catch my drift.
BTW, what’s the CDF?
the Congregation for the
the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Ratzinger’s old job.
ah, okay.
Thanks! Not being Roman Catholic, I am ignorant of many of these matters, but am always interested to learn more.